What Is the Twice a Month Salary System? 3 Powerful Reasons Anupam Mittal Says It Could End a Costly Employee Burden
For decades, most Indian employees have been paid once a month, often waiting until the end of the month or even the first week of the next month to receive their salaries. But is this old system still relevant in today’s digital economy? A fresh debate has erupted after entrepreneur Anupam Mittal publicly challenged what he calls a British-era payroll practice, sparking discussions across India’s corporate and startup ecosystem about Twice a Month Salary System.
Anupam Mittal Challenges the Traditional Payroll Model
The debate around the Twice a Month Salary System gained momentum after Anupam Mittal, founder of Shaadi.com, questioned India’s long-standing salary payout structure.
Mittal believes that many corporate payroll practices are rooted in an old British-era framework that may no longer serve the needs of a modern workforce. His suggestion is simple but significant: companies should pay employees twice every month, ideally on the 15th and 30th, instead of following the traditional monthly payout cycle.
The proposal has sparked a major discussion across India’s startup and corporate sectors, with supporters arguing that it could improve employee financial well-being and modernize workplace compensation practices.
Why Anupam Mittal Supports the Twice a Month Salary System
According to Mittal, the current system often forces employees to wait until the end of the month—or sometimes even the first week of the following month—to access money they have already earned.
He argues that this delay can create unnecessary financial pressure. Even a salary delay of a few days can trigger bounced EMIs, late rent payments, credit card penalties, and other financial hurdles.
The Twice a Month Salary System could help employees manage cash flow more effectively by providing access to income at shorter intervals. Instead of stretching one salary across an entire month, workers would receive funds more frequently, making budgeting easier and reducing dependence on short-term borrowing.
Mittal has emphasized that cash flow is not merely a financial issue but also a matter of dignity. Better access to earned income gives employees greater control over their day-to-day financial responsibilities.
Is India’s Payroll Structure Outdated?
One of Mittal’s strongest arguments is that employees work throughout the current month but are often paid in the next one. He describes this practice as outdated in an era where digital banking, automation, and payroll technology have advanced significantly.
Critics of changing the system often point to additional administrative work for payroll teams. However, Mittal believes modern payroll software makes processing salaries on the 15th and 30th completely manageable.
In today’s digital environment, companies can automate much of the payroll process, reducing the operational burden that may have existed years ago.
Employee Benefits Could Extend Beyond Salary Timing
Supporters of the Twice a Month Salary System argue that more frequent salary payments could bring benefits beyond personal budgeting.
Many companies promote employee-friendly initiatives such as remote work, wellness programs, flexible schedules, and free meals. However, timely access to earned wages remains one of the most important workplace benefits.
Receiving salary twice a month may help employees:
This could create a positive impact not only for workers but also for businesses through improved employee satisfaction and productivity.
A Model Already Adopted by His Company
Mittal has also highlighted that his own firm, People Group, moved away from the next-month payout model years ago.
Instead of delaying salary payments into the following month, the company shifted to crediting salaries within the current month itself. He describes this move as common sense and views it as a basic step toward protecting employee dignity.
For him, timely salary payments should not be seen as a special benefit but as a standard business practice.
Could the Twice a Month Salary System Benefit India’s Economy?
The discussion now extends beyond employee welfare. Advocates believe that putting money into employees’ hands more frequently could increase spending activity, improve cash circulation, and support broader economic growth.
While opinions remain divided, the Twice a Month Salary System has opened an important conversation about whether India’s payroll practices should evolve alongside its rapidly growing digital economy.
As more business leaders join the debate, the question is no longer whether the system can be changed—but whether companies are willing to embrace a compensation model designed for modern times.
FAQ
What do you think—should India move towards a Twice a Month Salary System, or does the traditional monthly salary cycle still work best? Share your thoughts, and keep visiting our site for more business, startup, and economy stories that impact your everyday life.
Disclaimer: This article is published for informational purposes only. Readers are advised to verify details from official sources before making any decisions. The website is not responsible for any loss or damage arising from the use of this information.
